Procedural Storytelling 2: Adaptive Difficulty

Ah, adaptive difficulty. Nothing makes designers happier, and players angrier, then a game that scales to meet exactly the player’s needs. And it’s a natural benefit (or curse) in procedural storytelling. Players just don’t want to hear that the game is gaming them back. They don’t want to be reminded that a computer is pulling the strings, outsmarting them in a sense, even if it is “for their own good”. At least when a designer lays out the level it’s a human doing it! This is a tough problem, but I think you can approach it 2 ways. Either you approach it as an AI problem (yes, the computer is better then you), or you approach it as a perception problem (this is just how the game was made).

I prefer the latter, but it’s not exactly the same, and it requires a few tweaks. The same kind of tweaks you’ll find in “bad” AI. I think the key is to make the difficulty laggy, like it’s reacting in “real” time as opposed to instantly. In practice, this is good anyways, because in procedural space we’re dealing with discrete fixed difficulty blocks anyways, “encounters”. What this means is that the player can always be “better” then the system. And it can clobber them for getting sloppy, for a little while. I think it also helps to have “tiers” if you’re in an RPG space, an area where the player knows the difficulty ranges between here and there relative to their own level. Consider Diablo 2’s Acts as an example. This has the effect of the player telling the designer what difficulty they want to be challenged at. The more ways you can do this, the better. Just don’t take it to the level where the AI responds immediately. The World Ends With You dynamic leveling setting is brilliant at this – to the point that it’s not really adaptive difficulty at all.

And of course, that’s always the final option. You don’t really need adaptive difficulty based on player intent to do procedural storytelling. You could progress the difficulty based on time passed, or the meta-arc, or the stage in the current story arc. In fact, you absolutely should progress it based on the micro story arc, because this contributes to the story’s tension and builds to a climax. But that will be my next topic.


One thought on “Procedural Storytelling 2: Adaptive Difficulty


    Here’s a link to a review of Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition, which is heavily playing into this form of adaptive difficulty as well. Monsters are specifically balanced against the current combined level of the party – as the party improves, the monsters automatically get harder. If only the players would be smart enough to stay at lower levels! But no, other rewards make them want to progress, and as I pointed out, in D&D these are guidelines – you could and probably should tweak them to make combats feel different and re-balance pacing. But most importantly, it gives you a benchmark to keep you from blowing out the players with one bad decision. I’ll tell you, as a DM, that’s always been way to hard and I almost always had to fudge the numbers mid-fight to make up for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s